ITEM NO.301 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A. NOS.18-22 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.328 OF 2002
NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s)
(For directions, permission to file appln., exemption from filing O.T.)
With I.A.No.23in I.A.No.18-22 (For directions), I.A.No.24 inI.A.No.21-22 (For exemption from filing
O.T.)
Date: 08/05/2006 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.G. BALAKRISHNAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B. SINHA
For Applicant(s) Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Adv.
Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv.
Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv.
Mr. S. Murlidhar,Adv.
Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shanti Bhushan,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
For Rajasthan: Mr. Aruneshwar Gupta,AAG.
Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh,Adv.
For Maharashtra: Mr. S.S. Shinde, Adv.
Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Adv.
Mr. R.K.Adsure, Adv.
For Gujarat: Mr. Ashok H. Desai,Sr.Adv.
Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv.
Ms. Shivangi, Adv.
For Union of India: Mr. Gopal Subramaniam,ASG.
Mr. T.S. Murthy,Adv.
Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.
1
For M/o Environt.: Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr.Adv.
Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani,Adv.
Ms. Anil Katiyar, Adv.
Mr. P. Parmeswaran,Adv.
Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv.
For Madhya Pradesh: Mr. Harish N. Salve,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Arun Jaitley,Sr.Adv.
Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv.
Mr. Vivek Narayan,Adv.
Mr. Dhrupad Kashyap,Adv.
Ms. Kiran Sarma,Adv.
For Narmada Control
Authority: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Syed Naqvi,Adv.
Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
We have heard learned counsel for the parties for considerable time. The
dispute is about the rehabilitation of the oustees in terms of the Award of the
Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal and decisions of this Court in Narmada Bachao
Andolan vs. Union of India reported in (2000) 10 SCC 664 and (2005) 4 SCC 32.
One of the issues is whether the oustees are to be rehabilitated in the State of
Madhya Pradesh pari passu with the completion of the dam or a year prior thereto.
Yet another issue is about the validity and the operation of Special Rehabilitation
Package (SRP). There are certain other issues as well. During the course of hearing,
Mr.Gopal Subramaniam, learned Additional Solicitor General, has brought to our
notice an Office Order dated 24th April, 2006 issued by the Government of India
constituting Sardar Sarovar Project Relief & Rehabilitation Oversight Group
comprising of Shri V.K.Shunglu, retired CAG, Government of India, as Chairman
and Prof. G.K.Chadha, Former Vice Chancellor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, and
Dr.Jaiprakash Narayan, Convenor, Loksatta, as its Members. This Oversight
Group has to report on the status of rehabilitation in the State of Madhya Pradesh of
the Project Affected Families (PAFs) to the Prime Minister through the Minister of
2
Water Resources. The specific terms of reference of the said Group are as under:
"a) Based on the Reports of the State Government ascertain the
number of project affected families affected due to submergence
caused by the raising of the height of the dam.
b) Estimate, on the basis of sample checks, the number of Project
Affected Families who may not have received so far, in full
measure, the Resettlement & Rehabilitation package as per the
norms laid down by the Award and the orders of the Supreme
Court.
c) Ascertain, on the basis of sample checks, if offers of alternate
land to eligible oustees were made in a fair and transparent
manner.
d) Ascertain, on the basis of sample checks, if such offers were
voluntarily refused by such oustees who preferred to accept the
Special Rehabilitation Package of the Government of Madhya
Pradesh.
e) Ascertain when all measures of rehabilitation, resettlement and
civic amenities as mandated by the Award (para 152 of Supreme
Court Judgement of October, 2000) will be in existence.
f) Recommend a system to ensure that all families affected by an
increase in the height of the dam to EL 121.92 metre, receive
within the next three months, the benefit of the Relief and
Rehabilitation package as per the norms laid down by the Award,
the relevant orders of the Supreme Court and of the Grievance
Redressal Authority of Madhya Pradesh."
The said Group had its first meeting on 27-28th April, 2006. The summary record of
discussions of the said meeting has been placed before us. The Group desired to
have detailed account of PAFs between the elevation levels (EL) 110.64 metre and
EL 121.92 metre in the State of Madhya Pradesh and decided to request the
Narmada Valley Development Authority to provide the same. The following
decisions were taken in that meeting:
"(i) NCA to (a) provide updated status of relief given to PAFs; (b)
provide submergence area for different levels of dam; (c) design a
draft questionnaire to be posed to the PAFs so that the NSSO can
finalise the same by 9th May, 2006; and (d) set up a control cell at
Indore for processing the data.
(ii) NSSO to (a) constitute 40 teams consisting of two members for
conducting the field work and simultaneously processing the data
commencing from 19th May, 2006 to complete the same within one
month; and (b) enumerate particulars of non-listed persons who
claim to be oustees.
(iii) Each team of NSSO to be accompanied by a revenue official of
3
NVDA.
(iv) A separate mechanism to scrutinize the claims of the non-
listed persons.
(v) Ministry of Water Resources to constitute four teams to visit
R&R sites to report on its development.
(vi) OSG to visit some villages after 15th June, 2006."
According to the aforesaid decision, 40 teams are to be constituted; each team
consisting of two members for conducting the field work and simultaneously
processing the data commencing from 19th May, 2006 to complete the same within
one month and also to enumerate particulars of non-listed persons who claim to be
oustees. The Group has decided to visit some villages by 15th June, 2006. The next
meeting of the Group is fixed for tomorrow, i.e., 9th May, 2006.
It was submitted by the learned Additional Solicitor General that the Group
will submit its report by the end of June, 2006 to the Prime Minister through
Minister of Water Resources in terms of the Office Order and that the Prime
Minister would be in a better position and would be better informed of facts on
receipt of the report from the said Group. We hope and expect that the Prime
Minister will be able to take a decision on or before 3rd July, 2006. We also hope
and trust that all concerned would fully cooperate with the teams and the work
assigned to the Oversight Group and would not cause any obstruction in the project
assigned to the Group. The decision taken shall be placed on record along with the
requisite material by 6th July, 2006. We would also be in a better position of facts
which are highly disputed on receipt of such report.
As at present, we are not inclined to restrain the continuing work of raising
the height of the dam.
List these matters for further hearing on 10th July, 2006.
(N. Annapurna) (V.P. Tyagi)
Court Master Court Master
4
|